Staticnz wrote:Gizmotech wrote:Carebear Stare!!!!!!
Well thank you, I appreciate your 'carebear' (!?!?!) (I like how if you are forced to say something positive it's such a bad thing for you) tip.
If I said what I really think in my usual tone I would be banned from the forums. Be thankful for that I find my inner carebear every now and then.
Staticnz wrote:It is actually useful so I appreciate it.
However, yes, my entire orientation in my home country was based around cultural exchange. English teaching itself was scarcely mentioned at all. That's just how it was.
So you got baited and switched because you failed to do appropriate research about the position prior to departure and believed the salesman at the front door. Like has been previously mentioned, we are all providing advice because this has been/will be the ALT role for years to come. Expecting the recruiters message of internationalization to be the job is like going into a soapland and asking for the hotty... regardless how much you hope you know you're getting the obaasan with 2 teeth at the end of the day. Welcome to Japan.
Staticnz wrote:Points about job, evaluation of attitude based on posts, work within your means.
Well your 'anti-carebear' advice is indeed rather awful.
I think your inability to grasp the reality of the situation is rather awful as well, but I opted not to say that.
Staticnz wrote:I'm not of the belief that intention is irrelevant, as folks often say. If I give my genuine point of view, it being perceived as 'negative' actually has nothing to do with the substance of what I'm saying. A negative point of view to me is one given in a state of base negativity, which I did not do. In fact, so called 'negativity' can be positive if it is used to shed light on problems and create discussion to fix things.
Therefore, you are merely besmirching my motives, which I think is not cool or at all useful.
I criticised the teachers I talked to as the 'negativity' they provided actually had no positive use. It was just hum harr for it's own sake.
I'm not sure what the purpose of explaining negativity to me was. If you are implying that my intention is to be negative, that is hardly the case. I am being rational, there is a difference. I absolutely besmirched your motives though, because I think you have a limited grasp of the reality of your situation.
Staticnz wrote:How people analyzed you
But it is dismissive to assume things about someone and then go from there to give criticism. It just is!
Those so called forum posts you quoted (most of which you actually just made up) would have it seem I'm running around the school bothering everyone I can about my idea, and going to the kyoto and kouchou senseis and bashing them over the head with all these ridiculous over the top ideas, and expecting everyone to bend over backwards and do what I say...so on...that the idea I have is extremely unreasonable and really terrible and crappy and has no use whatsoever...
All of which is total, unmitigated bullcrap. So what can I do with it.
I am many things, however I do not make things up. Keep your allegations civil. I won't bother listing them all, but to see the posts in question, look at who you replied to in sequence earlier today (and later today for that matter). Yes, these posts are assuming you're doing the equivalent act to what you've just described. As AVnichols points out, things need to be done in small chunks regardless if you are fresh to the job or not. This is Japan and as Antonath points "The nail that sticks up..."
Staticnz wrote:Job stuff
Well I want to live to work...that's just the way I'm wired. I did a lot of contracting and temp work back home and I was always irked then about not being a full team member, so I feel like I have to make my own way in life. So I will be doing this job for a few years but then I think I have to follow my own ambitions and gamble with failure.
I would seriously reconsider doing this job for several years based on your previous comments about requiring structure, feedback, official status, etc. You are not a Japanese Teacher, you are a walking English machine. You have similar status at the school to the local photocopier and require significantly less paperwork to replace. This status will not change regardless how many overly complicated events you plan.
Staticnz wrote:Three responses
You need to know what I actually mean by 'veil of indifference'. I'm clearly not saying they are indifferent about their jobs, their schools, their lives, their students, doing things...
I'm talking solely in relation to the ALT role. Now you reply it isn't their job to give a crap. EXACTLY. The role is not integrated into the schools! It is essentially a temp role in nature. If there were actual responsibilities, not to mention a true guideline or process to the job, how would that not be better?
Instead you keep characterising that I'm just saying oh all the teachers are terrible people who don't care about living and they all hate me. I'm not saying any of those things. Where do you think 'every situation is different' really came from? Besides some situational things, really the lack of clarity to the ALT job.
I'm not saying they're indifferent to their jobs at all, thank you. I am saying they are indifferent to you. Of COURSE the role isn't integrated into the schools. The schools have a requirement for this very expensive biological dictionary to be present because of the positive feel good image having a token object foreigner in the classroom makes. We do not have responsibilities because WE ARE NOT TEACHERS. PERIOD. In most cases ALTs don't even have a proper teaching degree (fly by night TESL/TEFL degrees do not count) nor do they even have education in Linguistics. I wouldn't give responsibilities to an unqualified over achieving fresh uni grad, especially if I had just worked for the past 6 years to get my position and responsibilities myself. I am not characterizing you in any particular way, other than being overly aggressive and unobservant. I would argue that you are probably seeing within my replies qualities within yourself that might need to be looked at more closely.
Ohh and here I thought ESID meant Eat Sushi In Diapers. Well now I know, and knowing is part of the battle. (This is sarcasm, but feel free to take it as a personal assault... you likely will anyways.)
Staticnz wrote:I suppose I crave some structure, and some OFFICIAL responsibilities. However I think many folks think differently and thus will defend to death the idea of coming up things on your own instead of being an actual full time member. And am I overpaid for what I do? Hell yes I am. In fact it makes me think the Japanese government needs to shake things up a bit. I guess they started by cutting JET pay next year, so that's something, but patching up the programme would be preferable.
I'm quite impressed by your comments so far, but here they seem to just fall apart. Your first paragraph is two separate ideas merged together without any element of cohesion. You need to stay on topic more clearly, or go back to first year uni and relearn what a paragraph is for. As for the second part of it, few people will disagree with being over paid for this job, but what does it matter? Furthermore what did that have to do with any of my three points?
Staticnz wrote:I just love that when I notice issues with the role it has to be from some great, insane paranoid fantasy of mine, and entertaining the notion that there are any problems shows I'm just a huge problem and so egotistical and out of control. So stupid!
Your noticing issues is our old story. We've seen this, read about this, identified this, and come to one rather substantial conclusion: It is not our job to change the system in any way, and having conversations in which we vent about our in ability to adapt to the situation around us is rather pointless. This is especially true when we see these conversations occur when the individual obviously has no idea what the purpose of the program is for, is unobservant to his superiors intentions or culture, and is attempting to rock the boat.
I would argue that your lack of observation of the individuals and requirements of the job around you does make you egotistical. Furthermore pushing forward with your idea, counter to your teachers , albeit indirectly, negative response shows you are both egotistical and out of control.
Staticnz wrote:Would that I was being overly sensitive (which I guess is true from the mere act of replying to things right), but saying someone is fresh out of college, or lived with their parents, or lacks experience, is such a blatant put down you're asking me to believe things that are obviously not true. So, shrug. I guess, if you think you're right, well, that's nice. Creating ideas about other people based on nothing is the same as saying they suck at life and you know everything. It's kind of amusing to me that you think that isn't insulting.
But I think that guy was just a troll so...you know what they say about feeding the trolls.
I am troll? Me. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
A Troll could've got you going with FAR less typing. See Mountainboy.
Alright sunshine, here's where the problem is. YOU ARE FRESH OUT OF UNIVERSITY. YOU ARE NOT A JAPANESE TEACHER. Combine these facts with the tone, attitudes, and content of your previous posts and we've got a pretty good profile for my aforementioned list of characteristics. You came onto an internet forum and this is all we have to work with, and well sunshine, you've sold yourself pretty good. At no point, have we said you suck at life nor are we trying to be insulting. We have, to varying degrees of sensitivity pointed out critical problems in your thinking and approach to the situation and you have insisted on ignoring this content in favour of attacking these posters. This is now the second time you've made self referential statements concerning life being less than acceptable. I would suggest getting some help for that.
As for whether or not I am right? Well... you know... I'm not the person who came to the forum, posted their content, and got butthurt over the responses. But then... I'm not the one with the problem am I?
Gizmo,
Signing posts like it's 1993
