Lichtgestalt wrote:I'd also love to work in Korea with EPIK, but it's the same problem again because they only accept applicants holding passports from English speaking countries.
I know NOVA went bankrupt, but apparently by now they're back and they've been integrated into another company called Jibun Mirai. At least that's what a German guy working for NOVA told me a couple of months ago in a forum. He also sent me a link to the company's site web site, which also has an application form. I don't much about GEOS, but I guess they are all also still around because my internship in Tokyo was just one year ago and my roommate was working for them at the time.
Gekishinken wrote:That and I believe I read that Neo-Nova has changed owners like every year since they came out of bankruptcy. Not a good employer at all.
Lichtgestalt wrote:So would you say I'm ok with Neo-NOVA as long as I have a contract before coming to Japan? I don't necessarily plan to stay longer than a year and since I'd be using a Working Holiday visa anyway, my visa wouldn't depend on the employer. It's just that I'd like to avoid coming to Japan and finding out that the school or even the whole company doesn't exist anymore.
Lichtgestalt wrote:Hi everyone,
I remember there used to be a forum for alternatives to JET, but somehow I can't find it so I'll just post in here. I'm not an English native speaker and I don't hold a passport of one of an English speaking country either, so JET is basically not an option for me. However, I'd still like to teach in Japan and since I studied both English and French (I'm a German native speaker), I thought it would be best to try schools that teach several languages in order to improve my chances because English-only schools would probably prefer a native English speaker no matter how qualified I am as a teacher (I'm qualified as a secondary school teacher for English, French and philosophy in Germany).
The problem is that when it comes to schools that teach several languages in Japan I basically only know Berlitz and I also heard that some NOVA branches teach French and German. So I wanted to ask you if you maybe know other schools that teach several languages in Japan and hire from overseas. It would be good if the whole recruitment process was in English because my Japanese isn't good enough to do more than just everyday conversations and basic reading. Well, maybe someone can help me nevertheless. Thanks very much in advance for your answers.
Ertai87 wrote:I'd advise JET and Interac and nothing at all else. Most of the other companies (NOVA, AEON, ECC, Berlitz, etc) are what are known as "Eikaiwas", which is basically Kumon for English, rather than public school. As a result, you are not beholden to actually teaching, you are responsible for making it look as though you are teaching. The two may sound the same, but are actually quite different. In the former, you can use well-known and well-accepted methods of teaching such as interactive games and activities, bringing in your own materials, etc, and change your methods as the curriculum/class/situation dictates. In the latter, you must work according to the company's methods, and if you don't like it, that's too bad. It doesn't matter if the kids actually learn anything, so long as you're doing things the company way.
Basically, if you want to feel some sort of fulfillment as a teacher, do not work for an Eikaiwa. AFAIK, only JET and Interac hire for public schools, and everywhere else is Eikaiwa.
BTW, my background is having taught at an Eikaiwa in Korea (it's not called "Eikaiwa" there, but it's the same thing) and having run into this situation personally.
EDIT: Just realized: As a non-American, you might not know what Kumon is. It's an after-school tutoring program.
Namisuke wrote:Ertai87 wrote:I'd advise JET and Interac and nothing at all else. Most of the other companies (NOVA, AEON, ECC, Berlitz, etc) are what are known as "Eikaiwas", which is basically Kumon for English, rather than public school. As a result, you are not beholden to actually teaching, you are responsible for making it look as though you are teaching. The two may sound the same, but are actually quite different. In the former, you can use well-known and well-accepted methods of teaching such as interactive games and activities, bringing in your own materials, etc, and change your methods as the curriculum/class/situation dictates. In the latter, you must work according to the company's methods, and if you don't like it, that's too bad. It doesn't matter if the kids actually learn anything, so long as you're doing things the company way.
Basically, if you want to feel some sort of fulfillment as a teacher, do not work for an Eikaiwa. AFAIK, only JET and Interac hire for public schools, and everywhere else is Eikaiwa.
BTW, my background is having taught at an Eikaiwa in Korea (it's not called "Eikaiwa" there, but it's the same thing) and having run into this situation personally.
EDIT: Just realized: As a non-American, you might not know what Kumon is. It's an after-school tutoring program.
As someone who has worked for an eikaiwa, I have a completely opposite experience. You can even say that JET is like the experience you described above as it all depends on the place you work for and your individual situation. Some JETs complain they never get any work and have to pretend to work a lot, as well as not feel like they are developing professionally. The place I worked for in Kanagawa had me plan lessons based on their curriculum. I had a direct supervisor, 2 days orientation, etc. It was pretty similar to JET but eikaiwa style. It is only a 3 month job, however. I wouldn't go and say that all eikaiwa jobs are poop and all ALT jobs are awesome.
AVNicholls wrote:Namisuke wrote:Ertai87 wrote:I'd advise JET and Interac and nothing at all else. Most of the other companies (NOVA, AEON, ECC, Berlitz, etc) are what are known as "Eikaiwas", which is basically Kumon for English, rather than public school. As a result, you are not beholden to actually teaching, you are responsible for making it look as though you are teaching. The two may sound the same, but are actually quite different. In the former, you can use well-known and well-accepted methods of teaching such as interactive games and activities, bringing in your own materials, etc, and change your methods as the curriculum/class/situation dictates. In the latter, you must work according to the company's methods, and if you don't like it, that's too bad. It doesn't matter if the kids actually learn anything, so long as you're doing things the company way.
Basically, if you want to feel some sort of fulfillment as a teacher, do not work for an Eikaiwa. AFAIK, only JET and Interac hire for public schools, and everywhere else is Eikaiwa.
BTW, my background is having taught at an Eikaiwa in Korea (it's not called "Eikaiwa" there, but it's the same thing) and having run into this situation personally.
EDIT: Just realized: As a non-American, you might not know what Kumon is. It's an after-school tutoring program.
As someone who has worked for an eikaiwa, I have a completely opposite experience. You can even say that JET is like the experience you described above as it all depends on the place you work for and your individual situation. Some JETs complain they never get any work and have to pretend to work a lot, as well as not feel like they are developing professionally. The place I worked for in Kanagawa had me plan lessons based on their curriculum. I had a direct supervisor, 2 days orientation, etc. It was pretty similar to JET but eikaiwa style. It is only a 3 month job, however. I wouldn't go and say that all eikaiwa jobs are poop and all ALT jobs are awesome.
To be fair Westgate seems to be a special case. It also requires one year of teaching experience which not everyone has.
I know that Westgate is an eikaiwa but I don't think it's quite the same in terms of working environment/expectations.
Did you work with kids or with university students? Were you on campus? Is it a small building that students come to or?